Attachment File Example

Attachment File Example Attachment File – Essay Example Essay In â€Å"Five Myths about Who Gets into College† the basic claim is that there is a big discrepancy in education between the poor and the rich. The highest percentage (74%) of students in selective colleges is from rich families with just a few from poor families. According to the article, admission policies of colleges favor rich student more. Further, there is a significant difference between SAT points for advantaged and disadvantage students attributed to race and socioeconomic factors. Also financial constraints make college dropout among poor students higher than their rich counterparts. The author uses data from previous researches, which makes his presentation more valid and authentic. In order to promote schooling of disadvantaged children, policies of selective colleges should be reviewed to promote equality in admission; students’ life context should be considered besides SAT points when admitting students and financial aid to poor students should be in creased.Darius Rejalis notion in â€Å"Five Myths about Torture and Truth† is that torturing of innocent individuals can be more detrimental than beneficial. According to him, torture is ineffective way of extracting the truth from the innocent, but rather a way of intimidating people. Rejalis presents historic evidence that portrays torture as a failure in intelligence. Many torture incidences in the past were far from success with detainees leashing no information at all in some cases. The author appears to be informing the readers about the topic because he takes no position throughout his presentation. The author’s presentation is so heart fetching that the readers can only see the animosity in torturing innocent people rather than the intention of the torturers. The author thus effectively communicates his idea that torture does more good than harm to its victims.

Marijuan issue essays

Marijuan issue essays Californias Medical Marijuana law Under federal law using marijuana in anyway is illegal. But starting on 1996 California passed proposition 215 making it legal to smoke marijuana if you have a serious illness and you need to obtain a doctors recommendation first. This law was passed because marijuana lessens pain and stops nausea from resulting from serious diseases. It also lowers the internal eye pressure associated with glaucoma which slows the process of blindness. It reduces the pain of AIDS patients plus it makes them hungry because of those suffering malnutrition because of AIDS wasting syndrome. It also reduces muscle spasticity and chronic pain because of multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, and spinal cord injuries. In 1998 the U.S. government sued the Oakland Cannabis Buyers Cooperative (OCBC) in federal court for violating the Controlled Substances Act. They want to do this because proposition 215 is very loose. For example to be order to get marijuana you would have to have a illness but it also say that you can use it for any other type of illness for which marijuana provides relief which could be stress, headaches, upset stomach, insomnia....or anything else. You wouldnt even need a written prescription to get it. Anyone with a oral recommendation or approval by a physician can grow, possess, or smoke marijuana. Even little kids can smoke pot legally if they have a prescription. Plus there is no FDA approval for marijuana. The quality, purity and strength of the drug is unregulated. The Government wanted the OCBC to be ban from distributing marijuana to patients. But the OCBC in there defense said that it acted out of medical necessity because of seriously ill citizens, and that such a medical necessity should be an exception to the law. But the district court favored the U.S. government, which caused the OCBC to shutdown. But In May 2001 the Supreme C ...

Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 2

Law - Essay Example The gang members had sewn black and gold emblems on the prison issue shirts. This prompted the jail management to establish a rule banning the display of such colors that deviate from the established prison clothing. The rule encourages the inmates to wear homemade black and gold Rosary Beads around their necks and thus the prison staff decides to confiscate them, but the inmates threaten to file a suit against such action since action interferes with their freedom of worship. However, as a warden of the jail, I would go ahead and confiscate the beads since laws and regulations must be respected and appreciated by both parties (Singh et al, 2007). Being partisan to one law at the expense of the other is biased since it limits the freedom of other people guided by the foregone law or regulation. Therefore, for the prisoners to complain that their right to practice own religion is compromised due to confiscation of the beads is biased since in observing their right, the gang also deny the prison its right to implement laws that facilitate effective management and promotes equality. In case, the right of the prisoners is observed and respected, then what about the rest of the inmates who do not belong to such religion? They will feel discriminated and not recognized. Moreover, what if the prisoners demand similar treatment, but each one of them belongs to a different religion? This will lead to a mixture of prison uniforms and thus, will compromise the integ rity of the prison uniform and lead to loss of its identity. Therefore, in this scenario, the suit is likely to fail since in observing the right to practice religion, the rights of other prisoners and the prison will be compromised and thus lead to biasness (Siegel, 2009). Based on such considerations, the court will reject the suit considering the above grounds. The right of an inmate to proper medical services is justified and protected in all